Reference
Shaw, D. (2008). Wikipedia in the newsroom: While the line “according to Wikipedia” pops up occasionally in news stories, it’s relatively rare to see the user-created online encyclopedia cited as a source. But some journalists find it very valuable as a road map to troves of valuable information. In P. De Palma (Ed.), Annual editions: Computers in society 10/11 (pp. 108-110). New York: McGraw Hill.
Summary
This article, which was written for American Journalism Review, talks about varying viewpoints of the use of Wikipedia by journalists. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone with internet access. Erroneous edits can be deleted by Wikipedia staff, but not everything is caught which means that the information found in Wikipedia is not necessarily accurate. According to the article, most journalists do not see Wikipedia as a viable source for information. Some journalists, however, agree that Wikipedia is a great place to go to find ideas. Many articles are full of good information and liked to credible sources.
Most often, when Wikipedia is cited by someone as a source it is because the user does not fully understand Wikipedia. Wikipedia is open about the fact that the information found inside is not necessarily accurate. Their online disclaimer includes the words “please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information”. Students often cite Wikipedia when they write because it is the first thing that comes up in the search engine. Likewise, reporters who have never heard of the source may use it erroneously.
Reaction
No comments:
Post a Comment